4 comments
I have my thoughts about additional reasons for the CoFaS, beyond the introversion. I think you are ISTJ, right? I tried doing some searches on your site for your letters, and came up with Sinterklaus, on an ISTJ or INTJ search or something. Anyway, I am INFP, and the N and P side of me loves the vision and strategy discussions. The introvert in me needs to have these be smaller meetings.
The design and the designer are both perfect, and the vision guys have to partner with the tree to tree guys ensure success. Best wishes with overcoming CoFaS or making the very best of it.
n my case, two researchers had the good idea to gather people together who were working on an obscure technical problem at isolated and scattered universities. They wanted to create an opportunity to share information, to exchange tools, and to socialize.
At our meeting, they presented an update, and it was similar to what you described: What is the mission, the definition, the vision, the goals, for the group. Could we agree on definitions for terms, and on formats for data and tools.
The process seemed, in our case, to have taken over the group.
It left me wondering how this had happened. I imagine that if there are a few people who like having structure, they can quickly refocus the gathering onto creating it. Those (of us) who think it's a good idea but don't want to do it leave them to get on with it. But sometimes, it can consume the group.
I think that there has to be balance: some time in your group for 'bottom-up' discussion of individual experiences, more rooted in everyday work. In mine, we forced time to sit in a circle and have each person present a bit of their work and for us all to discuss it. People's stories reflected their enthusiasm or issues, always rooted in their experiences and creativity.
Did you get the time to share 'war stories' (in your analogy) and to find some new ideas and techniques? In my experience, you need both the vision and the battle stories.
I'm INTJ, BTW :)


